The idea that “just because something is legal doesn’t make it right” really stood out to me when thinking about advertising, especially after watching Thank You for Smoking. The movie shows how someone can successfully defend and promote a harmful product simply by being persuasive. We see these typers of scenarios all the time in todays world. I would argue the way a product is marketed reflects on how many sales it gets. Good marketing, great sales, poor marketing, not so great sales. I think I would be able to do the same job as Nick, but it would be morally difficult.
The salary would make it very tempting. If I were offered $100,000 or even $200,000 a year, it would be hard to turn down. But at the same time, I think I would struggle knowing that my work could contribute to people harming their health. For some people, money talks and this would be no issue at all. But, for someone like me, I would struggle to promote this product. Just because tobacco or vaping products are legal to advertise doesn’t mean it’s morally right to promote them, especially when companies are aware of the risks.
While the journalists methods were aggressive, she facinated me. I think she was justified in exposing the truth about how the tobacco industry operates. If companies are intentionally hiding harmful information, then bringing that to light serves the public good and is a morally correct thing to do. In this case, I think that is was the correct thing to do. Since people know how harmful the product is, they can now make informed decisions on their own and chose whether or not to continue using the product.
When it comes to banning advertising for harmful products like cigarettes, alcohol, or gambling, I’m torn. On one hand, these products can clearly cause harm, so limiting their promotion could protect public health. On the other hand, the First Amendment protects commercial speech to some extent, and completely banning ads could raise legal concerns. Personally, I think there should be stricter regulations rather than total bans, especially when it comes to targeting younger audiences.
The issue becomes even more complicated with marijuana. Even though it is still illegal at the federal level, many states allow it and advertise it openly. I find many people chose to ignore how harmful it can truly be, because it makes them "feel good". Because of the internet, those ads can reach people in states where it is illegal. This issue specifically highlights how inconsistent laws can be. I believe something should be legal/illegal in ALL states, not just a game of picking and choosing.
Overall, this topic made me realize that advertising isn’t just about creativity or persuasion, it also involves real ethical responsibility and moral knowledge. Just because you can promote something doesn’t always mean you should, and that’s a line every communicator has to decide for themselves.








